Russia and China Outmaneuvering the West in Weaponizing Space


China and Russia have been quickly building and deploying both ground and space-based weapons intended for destroying satellites. At the same time, China and Russia have been pressing the United States to agree to a treaty prohibiting anti-satellite weapons. The United States possesses a significant number of critical space-based military capabilities. When viewed from the outside, the treaty sounds ideal. Nobody desires a space-based arms race.

These space-based capabilities include communications, missile defense, intelligence, and other satellites. If the U.S. is to be successful in stopping aggression of authoritarian regimes, Washington needs to prevent being drawn into international treaties that other competing powers have no intention of respecting or following.
Beijing and Moscow have submitted The Treaty on the Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer Space and of the Threat or Use of Force Against Outer Space Objects (PPWT) to the United Nations. The PPWT obligates signing countries not to place any weapons in outer space. Additionally, the treaty prohibits countries from using or threatening to use force against satellites or other objects in space.

Outside the forum of the United Nations, both Russia and China have been rushing to deploy anti-satellite weaponry and have been successfully developing and fielding this weaponry for years. Space is already being contested and has been militarized by China and Russia. According to international diplomacy researchers such as the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, both China and Russia have previously tested their anti-satellite weaponry which is capable of destroying satellites in orbit. Additionally, these countries have already been deploying space-based capabilities that could be used to destroy satellites. A Russian satellite previously conducted a weapons test that fired what seemed to be a space torpedo. These weaponized satellites have been veiled in public discourse, by being disingenuously described as peaceful commercial satellites. It does not appear as if Russia or China have any intention of being honest or transparent about their ambitions to weaponize space.

Despite these realities, China and Russia have been rushing the PPWT to be signed. The PPWT states that all governments should not be the first to place weapons in space. In practice, this treaty would protect China and Russia’s already existing space-based weapons while stopping the United States from developing its capabilities. Moreover, the PPWT does not provide any actual mechanism for inspecting or checking that satellites are in fact used for non-military purposes.

The United States and its allies need to build the resilience and capability of military and intelligence space-based platforms. Organizations committed to the defense of democracies believe giving in to a treaty like the PPWT only handcuffs the United States while allowing China and Russia to maintain and build their space-weaponization capabilities. If rules are to be laid out for international conduct in space, they need to be done through genuine efforts that would produce actual compliance instead of advancing authoritarian regimes. Russia and China are already engaged in a space-based weapons race, and the United States and its allies need to be careful to prevent being outmaneuvered diplomatically.


Popular posts from this blog

NATO’s Final Frontier – Space?

Image
It appears that The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has agreed, at least in spirit, that space is a military ‘operational domain’ and decisions in the future should be made accordingly. This is a sharp contrast to the thinking decades ago, where European Space Agency’s (ESA) 22-members had stated that space ‘must’ remain non-militarized, even as the U.S. and Russians continued to covertly plan for the future wars in space, or use of space assets for dual purpose – instruments of experimentation and weapons of war. What changed? After all, the Russians and Americans both participated along with Europe, Japan and other nations in the ISS (International Space Station). Most all developed and even some less-than-developed nations have communication satellites. China has a robust space program, India too. After the cold-war with Russia we learned of secret and not so secret U.S. and Russian space weapons projects. Since then both China and India have downed their own satellites
Read more

Putin The Conqueror Expands To South America

Image
It's no secret Vladimir Putin wants Russia to be the great superpower again it was before the collapse of the USSR. It's also obvious that Putin wants to maintain relevance on the world stage. Russia is energy rich, politically astute, and has a reputation for a strong military - thus, a force to be reckoned with. It uses this power to its advantage across the globe as The Washington Times explains . Russia's Middle East Meddling In the Middle East Russia is working to establish stronger ties with Iran, assisting with a missile defense system (S-300) to prevent any future potential US strike. Meanwhile, Iran continues using proxy terrorist strategies across the Middle East as a method to serve its political will. And, of course, we know all too well what Russia has been doing in Syria propping up the Assad regime, while claiming to defend their Russian military port, now Russia has an airbase in Syria too. Today, Syria has been all but destroyed leaving a humanitarian d
Read more

Russian Cyber Security Threats Far From Over

Image
Every American Citizen, every large corporation, and every government agency down to the local level has in some way been affected by cyber hacking. Today, we are aware of the threat personally and we go out of our way to protect our personal information. Still, that doesn’t mean someone we do business with that has our personal data won’t fall victim to a cyber hack or attack. Regardless of what you believe the cyber hacking risks are, it is a present danger. It’s a reality. We’ve all heard by the media that Russia hacked our last presidential election , and while there is a lot of dispute about what actually happened in the Democratic National Committee hack, the incident does show the vulnerability to our most sacred trust – our free and fair elections. We don’t need to enumerate the endless times our personal financial data or at least our personal information has gotten into the hands of cybercriminals – we all remember the big Target Stores hack and the Experian Credit Agency
Read more